RSS

Tag Archives: abortion

Building Up the Tallest Midget

It's not March, but we're down to The Final Four

By any standard, the candidates running for the Republican presidential nomination are a sad bunch of retreads, weaklings, reactionaries and fatally flawed losers. Mitt Romney is the quintessential rich White man who can barely keep up a brave face when he’s mingling with the unwashed masses, but he’s willing to put on a brave face and hold his nose if that’s what it takes to win.

Newt Gingrich is a narcissist and an egotist whose intellectual racism and repulsive personality makes him hard even for conservatives to take. Then there’s Ron Paul. He’s a special case. He’s not a great thinker like Gingrich or a flip-flopping fake like Romney. No other candidate can claim the kind of enthusiastic support as Paul does. No other candidate seems as genuine and unpretentious as Paul.

There’s also no other candidate as extreme and out of the mainstream as Paul. I’ve made my case against Baby Doc Paul that he is an unworthy of the presidency. The Washington Post ripped away Paul’s ass-covering lies that he wasn’t aware of the racist material in his newsletters.

I don’t expect the Paul die-hards and dead enders to be the least bit disabused of their fantasy that he is a kindly old man who speaks truth to power and advocates a handful of positions that attracts uninformed liberals. Theirs is a separate reality where neither light nor truth penetrates.

The true believers are with Paul all the way until the last bomb falls on the bunker. It’s the rail-sitters and undecided who will have to finally make a call and choose between acknowledging Ron Paul either is a racist personally or just a cynical politician and manipulative businessman willing to exploit racial and homophobic fears to make a dirty buck.

What comes next in tomorrow’s primary in Florida?

Romney crushes Gingrich by double digits. The anti-Romney forces will continue to bitch and moan, but their failure to coalesce behind a single candidate makes them an annoyance, not an insurmountable obstacle.  Their choices will come down to holding their nose and pulling the lever for Mitt or watch Obama raising his right hand again next January.  Screw the Tea Party!  They will get nothing but insincere lip service from Romney and they deserve nothing.

Paul soldiers out looking for friendlier (and cheaper) caucus states and other places where the Ron Paul Race War Revolution might play well.  He’ll hang around like a bad odor while he decides whether to launch another rogue run as an independent.  Sonny boy Rand might tell dear old dad to sit his ass down in a rocking chair somewhere as not to cock block his inevitable bid in 2016.

Santorum is toast.  Put the pennies on the eyes.  His moment of glory came and went in Iowa, proving yet again that the best thing that unrepresentative state contributes to presidential contests is exposing weak candidates not ready for the real deal and croaking wannabees who had no business running in the first place.  One less repulsive right-winger gone.  No great loss.

Which doesn’t mean Rick Santorum isn’t deserving of scorn for his reprehensible remarks about rape victims and abortion. Isn’t it always the way that it’s the most pious and supposedly reverentially religious bastards who have so much love in their hearts for the unborn and nothing but contempt for the living?

On the way home the other day I passed a church where there were 150 little white crosses in the ground and a sign that read, “In the last hour there were 150 children destroyed by abortion.”

That’s pretty heavy-handed, but it takes a prick like Santorum to make it even worse for women facing the difficult choice whether to have an abortion. Piers Morgan interviewed Santorum and asked him if he could deny his daughter an abortion if she were impregnated through an act of rape.

Well, you can make the argument that if she doesn’t have this baby, if she kills her child, that, too, could ruin her life. And this is not an easy choice. I understand that. As horrible as the way that son or daughter and son was created, it still is her child. And whether she has that child or doesn’t, it will always be her child. And she will always know that. And so to embrace her and to love her and to support her and get her through this very difficult time, I’ve always, you know, I believe and I think the right approach is to accept this horribly created — in the sense of rape — but nevertheless a gift in a very broken way, the gift of human life, and accept what God has given to you.

I despise Santorum. He is one of those far Right extremists whom I am incapable of saying a good word about. Beyond his casual racism, there’s his overt hatred of women. I don’t know how you could characterize Santorum’s stupidly sanctimonious remarks as anything but the most repellent kind of misogyny.

Leave it up to a man who will never face an unwanted pregnancy brought out by an act of violence to make an awful situation even worse. Why is the same people who decry government regulation and intrusions into the private life of Americans espouse views where the womb becomes a state-owned asset?

I don’t have an answer, so I turn to the Church of Carlin for one.

Sanctimonious Santorum will be a historical footnote in a matter of weeks or days. Gingrich will soon follow, but after thwarting his threat to Romney in Iowa and again in Florida, the GOP will try to shoot Newt’s zombie campaign of White Rage in the head and put him down once and for all. The powers that be want an electable empty suit to take on President Obama, not a self-centered “big thinker” who wants to colonize the moon.

The Republican establishment wants Mittens vs. Obama and they’re determined to get it.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on January 30, 2012 in News & Views

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Abortion is Not O.K. in Oklahoma.

 

Arizona’s harsh new policy cracking down on illegal immigrants got more attention, but equally punitive legislation went into effect in Oklahoma when the Republican-dominated state legislature overrode vetoes by Democratic Gov. Brad Henry to enact some of the nation’s most repressive abortion laws. 

One law requires women seeking an abortion to undergo an ultrasound procedure and watch the monitor and hear a detailed description of the developing fetus.  The second law eliminates lawsuits against physicians who do not give the woman information about possible fetal birth defects.   No exceptions are made for women who are victims of rape and incest. 

I can count on one hand how many times over the years I’ve written about abortion and that’s probably something I should  be a bit  embarrassed about, but what is about to happen in Oklahoma isn’t just repressive, it’s downright pornographic. 

These laws exhibit a perverse love of poking and prodding women’s bodies for no good reason—and often for great harm. The ultrasound law specifies that a vaginal probe must be used, even though doctors often prefer to skip that if their patients have been through sexual trauma in the past. But it’s hard to imagine these legislators caring too much about rape victims. They love the idea of penetrating the vaginas of unwilling women so much that this is the second time they’ve tried to pass this law. And the other law is an attempt to encourage doctors to perform amniocenteses on pregnant women, but withhold any information from the patients regarding actual test results. Apparently, sticking needles into pregnant women for no good reason seems like reward enough to these legislators. 

The cliché is if men could get pregnant they would have a completely perspective about pregnancy.  How many guys would want a camera shoved up their butt to see the baby in their womb wiggling?   If you’re pro-life there might be an argument to be made that a woman should be fully informed about her pregnancy options.  You lose me though when it is mandatory that the ultrasound must be performed with a vaginal probe instead of simply using a transducer over the maternal abdomen.   When my wife was carrying our first child there was something magical about the process of seeing the baby on the monitor.  Had the obstetrician gone up the old hoo-had to sneak a peek I would have chilled back in the waiting room. 

This won't be how a pregnant woman gets an ultrasound in Oklahoma.

This is just the latest example of predominantly male politicians asserting their God-given right to control a woman’s reproductive organs since she’s not capable of making those kind of tough decisions for herself.

“Git on back to the bedroom, honey. Put on your sexiest flannel nightgown ’cause I’m gonna go fetch my cowboy hat and spurs. I’m feelin’ frisky tonite”
  

When is the matriarchy taking over and what the hell is wrong with the women of Oklahoma that they would sit back and take this crap without rioting in the streets?   I’ve never been there, but I’m informed Oklahoma is a very conservative and religious state 

I’m not going to call it religious zealotry as much as I’m going to call it subjugated women being submissive and deferential to the insistence of men to control the bodies of women and bend them to their will. 

What’s surprised me most is how few women know extreme the new Oklahoma abortion restrictions are and how even fewer seem to be roused into taking action.   I know that feminism isn’t what it once was and many young women seem more interested in squeezing into a pair of skinny jeans than marching in the streets demanding their reproductive rights be respected.  

Because I can assure them wherever you they there is someone who is thinking right now, “Those restrictions in Oklahoma are fine, but they don’t go far enough.” 

It is not okay when women are treated like ignorant children and breed mares by forces outside of their control. If the bodies of men were being regulated and restricted in this way there would be armed insurrection in the streets of Oklahoma. 

That isn’t to suggest women should take up the gun, but meekly turning the cheek and hoping things will just work themselves out if they don’t protest won’t get them a damn thing except more Draconian legislation designed to take away a woman’s choice. 

Well-behaved women rarely make history and they don’t preserve, protect or defend their basic human rights either. 

  

If young women are “utterly complacent about the state of affairs” maybe it’s because their mothers and sisters were too successful and made things too easy for them. Where there is no struggle there is no progress and for too many kids today a struggle to them means trying to squeeze into some skinny jeans. 

While the defenders of Roe v. Wade were fighting to keep it from being overturned, the pro-lifers were moving on multiple fronts and if they couldn’t get rid of Roe, by God, they would do everything they could to make getting an abortion as difficult, shameful and humiliating as possible. 

Parental notification. Waiting periods. Slide shows of fetuses. Spousal permission required. And when that doesn’t work close down as many abortion clinics as possible and watch the number of physicians willing to provide abortions dwindle. 

You’ve got to give the pro-life forces credit. They had a strategy. They had the money and organization. They had the boots on the ground. They worked the plan and while they haven’t accomplished the Grand Plan yet by overturning Roe, they haven’t given up on it. They’re probably praying for Ruth Bader Ginsburg to hold on until 2012 for a Republican president to appoint her replacement and give John Roberts the sixth vote he needs. 

To what’s left of contemporary feminism I have a message: If you think you can sit back safe, snug and secure in the thought where you are and what happens to women in Oklahoma means nothing to you, you’re living in a fool’s paradise. If the time comes to assert control over your reproductive organs, your silence won’t save you. Repression doesn’t make exceptions for passive non-combatants. You can play the part of Switzerland if you want. When the deal goes down nobody in Oklahoma will give a damn about you either. 

Is this the future of abortion "choice?"

When the day this becomes what “choice” means for a woman in America wanting to end an unwanted pregnancy, maybe they’ll wish they had done something while they still could.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on May 3, 2010 in News & Views

 

Tags: , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 647 other followers