Fighting the “Anti-Hillary”

One of the after-effects of the long, costly and often caustic presidential primary between Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama was exposing the serious areas of differences between White feminists and Black activists.

An encouraging sign of healing was Clinton’s great speech at the Democratic National Convention.   Another was Hillary’s decision to return to the campaign trail in no small part to counter the anti-Hillary, Sarah Palin, in John McCain’s cynical bid to peel away former Clinton supporters.

Clinton is sending a message that she’s not going to allow a newbie like Palin stake any claim on her constituency.

Another encouraging sign comes from the materfamilias of the American women’s movement, Gloria Steinem.

Gloria Steinem gets it, but will Hillarys supporters?

Gloria Steinem gets it, but will Hillary's supporters?


Writing in The Los Angeles Times, Steinem dropped the hammer on Palin’s phony symbolism.

Here’s the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the anti-feminist right wing — the folks with a headlock on the Republican Party — are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women — and to many men too — who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley Chisholm, who first took the “white-male-only” sign off the White House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes.

But here is even better news: It won’t work. This isn’t the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It’s about making life more fair for women everywhere. It’s not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It’s about baking a new pie.

Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton’s candidacy stood for — and that Barack Obama’s still does. To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, “Somebody stole my shoes, so I’ll amputate my legs.”

So let’s be clear: The culprit is John McCain. He may have chosen Palin out of change-envy, or a belief that women can’t tell the difference between form and content, but the main motive was to please right-wing ideologues; the same ones who nixed anyone who is now or ever has been a supporter of reproductive freedom. If that were not the case, McCain could have chosen a woman who knows what a vice president does and who has thought about Iraq; someone like Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison or Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. McCain could have taken a baby step away from right-wing patriarchs who determine his actions, right down to opposing the Violence Against Women Act.

Palin’s value to those patriarchs is clear: She opposes just about every issue that women support by a majority or plurality. She believes that creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves global warming; she opposes gun control but supports government control of women’s wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves “abstinence-only” programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and abortions; she tried to use taxpayers’ millions for a state program to shoot wolves from the air but didn’t spend enough money to fix a state school system with the lowest high-school graduation rate in the nation; she runs with a candidate who opposes the Fair Pay Act but supports $500 million in subsidies for a natural gas pipeline across Alaska; she supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the lesser evil of offshore drilling. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger . LATimes

There have always been members of oppressed and disenfranchised group willing to sell out their race or gender for personal advantage.   Sarah Palin is a woman who is all too glad to accommodate the right-wing patriarchs of the Republican Party to further her own political career.

If there weren’t already enough reasons to oppose the election of John McCain, selecting the incredibly pallid and minimally qualified  Palin is yet another reason to.

5 thoughts on “Fighting the “Anti-Hillary”

  1. Gotta be honest with you Jeff.

    I’m still not feeling the feminists much.

    Until Obama decided to run for president, I considered myself among them. But you only get to reject me and my issues in the name of “equality” once before you get my “Perform an Anatomically Impossible Act” award.

    I agree with you that Gloria Steinem and the gang have seen the enemy and it is them. But the question becomes, what are they going to do about it? And what are they going to do to mend the fences between feminists black and white?

    Because if you ask this former black feminist, they’re going to have to work really, really hard to get back into my good graces.

    Personally, I don’t think they have the muscle to pull it off.

    Like

Don't Be Shy...Leave A Comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s