Black QB Sports Tats. White Hack Attacks.

kapernick-tats

There is a great deal of buzz and most of it overwhelmingly negative to a column (and I use that in the most liberal sense of the word) written by David Whitley of the AOL Fanhouse where he rips into San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick for the tattoos on his body.

Excerpts:

“San Francisco’s Colin Kaepernick is going to be a big-time NFL quarterback. That must make the guys in San Quentin happy.

Approximately 98.7 percent of the inmates at California’s state prison have tattoos. I don’t know that as fact, but I’ve watched enough “Lockup” to know it’s close to accurate.

I’m also pretty sure less than 1.3 percent of NFL quarterbacks have tattoos. There’s a reason for that.

NFL quarterback is the ultimate position of influence and responsibility. He is the CEO of a high-profile organization, and you don’t want your CEO to look like he just got paroled.”

Whitley continues:

“For dinosaurs like me, NFL quarterbacks were our little Dutch boys. The original hero stuck his finger in the dyke to save Holland. Pro QBs were the last line of defense against the raging sea of ink. When our kids said they wanted a tattoo, we could always point to the Manning brothers.”

My guess is Archie would have made Peyton throw an extra 1,000 passes before dinner if he’d come home with a tattoo. The old man knew QBs are different.”Did Sammy Baugh, Johnny Unitas, Doug Williams or Joe Montana have arms covered in ink? Do Tom Brady, Drew Brees or Aaron Rodgers? The world will end when Tim Tebow shows up a tattoo parlor.

Then, Whitley goes for the money shot:

It’s not just a white thing, I hope. When the Panthers interviewed Cam Newton, owner Jerry Richardson popped the question.

This is David Whitley.  He doesn't like quarterbacks with tats.

This is David Whitley. He doesn’t like quarterbacks with tats.

Do you have any tattoos?” he asked.

No, sir,” Newton said. “I don’t have any.”

We want to keep it that way,” Richardson said.

He was OK with body art on other players, including the human canvas that is Jeremy Shockey. But Newton would be the face, arms and legs of the franchise. The boss didn’t want them covered in ink lines.

Let’s keep it that way,” he told Newton.

In Whitley’s world, if you can’t be a White QB sans tats, the next best thing is to be a Black QB sans tats. Cam Newton: good Black quarterback. Colin Kapernick: bad Black quarterback.

I can only guess where Robert Griffith III with his dreads fall on the continuum.

A few thoughts: In the NFL the only God that is worshiped is the God of Money. A player can gun down the mother of his child, drive to the stadium, confront the coach and general manager and blow his own brains out as they watch in horror and the league will offer grief counselors for the traumatized team, but the game scheduled for Sunday goes on. Next man up.

No athlete in any sport is more disposable than a professional football player. Their contracts are not guaranteed unlike their counterparts in baseball and basketball. Blow out a knee today and you’re out on the street tomorrow. Literally.

If a football player’s body betrays him, if it breaks down, if it becomes too beat-up and battered to make a Jerry Richardson and owners like him money, he will get rid of the tattoo free Cam Newton like yesterday’s breakfast. The NFL uses up young men and discards them. Whose business is it they want a one tat or decide to turn their entire body into a canvas. Their bodies are all they own. They should be free to do with it as they will even if it pisses Jerry Richardson and David Whitley.

Colin is a young Black man who was adopted by Rick and Teresa Kaepernick and while they are proud of their son’s success as an NFL QB, they weren’t happy with Whitley comparing him to convicts, as they explained to USA Today.

“It annoyed me,” Teresa said. “You are categorizing this kid on something like tattoos? Really? Saying other guys are role models because they don’t have them? Really? Some of these other guys don’t have crystal clear reputations. That’s how you’re going to define this kid? It’s pretty irritating, but it is what it is.”

This David Whitley's boss.  What's HIS problem?

This is David Whitley’s boss. What’s HIS problem?

“This guy has probably never talked to Colin,” Rick said. “Instead of saying that Colin does all these great things and donates his time to children, this guy is going to make him out like a gangster. Really? I guess you just have to roll with the punches.”

It’s this kind of crap vomited up by hacks like David Whitley that feeds into the stereotype of Young Black Men as Thugs/Gangsta Wannabees and it isn’t a vast leap in logic to think this stereotype is what is rattling around in the mind of a George Zimmerman when he hunts down a hoodie-wearing Trayvon Martin or a Michael Dunn when he blows away a Justin Davis who was bumping his music too loud.

Isn’t it about time someone shot Whitley, Bill O’Reilly and every other White man jonesing for the good old days with a tranquilizer dart, implanted a microchip in their asses and shipped them back to The Fifties where they and their “Traditional America” can live happily ever motherfucking after?

The overwhelmingly negative response to Whitley’s race-baiting rant should make it clear to Sporting News Editor-in-Chief Garry D. Howard that Whitley’s column was in atrociously bad taste at best and is insulting and offensive at worst.

Mr. Howard is an African-American. He might be sensitive to how poisonous it is to permit wretched stereotypes to go unchecked and unchallenged.

Real quarterbacks don't have tats.  Says who?

Real quarterbacks don’t have tats. Says who?

Related articles

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Black QB Sports Tats. White Hack Attacks.

  1. Well, guess I must be part of that gansta, convict, thug whatever crowd. Course I got my first one nearly 40 years ago, long before it was the ‘in’ thing to do. Certainly long before it was accepted for women to walk around with tats. Now, 40 years later I have a collection that I will likely add to.

    Can’t imagine what Whitley would say about me, oh never mind yes I can.

  2. I’m Black. I don’t care for the whole tattoo craze and I do associate bodies covered in tattoos a prison thing, just like I associate saggy pants with prison. I also think its ridiculous for men to wear earings. These football players can do whatever they want I don’t care, I don’t watch it anyway. However, if I had a son I would not allow him to wear tattoos, earings or saggy pants. Black people have enough racism going against us to last a lifetime. Black skin is out tattoo, so why suppliment that with ink, earings and saggy pants? I am so glad my parents had the common sense not to let me fall into these “styles”. I’m with David Whitley on this one and I’m glad he had the courage to speak up and not fall in line with this ridiculous lifestyle.

    • First you say “These football players can do whatever they want, I don’t care” and then you go off on a rant about “this ridiculous lifestyle.” Make up your mind, willya?

      Colin Kapernick’s tats are none of David Whitley business or yours either. He’s the guy sporting the ink. Don’t like it? Watch another game and you’re both spared the trauma of a young Black man wearing his favorite Bible verses on his torso.

      If you’re so proud of being Black, why do you need a White man like Whitley to define Blackness for you? That’s pathetic.

      Oh, and though I don’t wear baggy pants, have any tattoos, or wear earrings, I know brothers that do and they aren’t any less of one because of how they choose to dress. You can wear a suit and tie everyday and be a complete asshole. The prisons are also full of plenty of white-collar crooks too. But neither David Whitely or you seem to realize White men go to prison too.

      Or among the lessons you learned, did you forget the one about “clothes don’t make the man?”

      • Dude, seriously, just because I agree with the statement made by David Whitley doesn’t mean he’s defining my Blackness, and just because he’s white doesn’t make him wrong. Having a body covered in tattoos is foolish if you’re white or Black. My point is that a Black youngster covered in tattoos will suffer the consequences of negative stereotyping more so than a white person. Using the prison example, I guarantee you that a white person getting out of prison has more resources for getting employment than a Black person that was in the same situation, just like a white person with a high school diploma is more likely to be promoted on a job than a Black person with more education. I’m speaking in general terms. Racism does exist and wearing tattoos, earrings (on men) and ill fitting clothes will typecast a Black male more so than his white counterpart. As an employer, if I had to choose between hiring someone with tattoos or someone without them, I’d hire the person without them regardless of the color of their skin. Am I being bias? Yes. Get over it. The world is full of bias. Thats just the way it is. You have the freedom to do whatever you want, just be prepared to suffer the consequences.

        Football players, whether they like it or not (and unfortunately so), are role models to some of our youth. Unfortunately, some of them are bad role models, like the one that recently shot his girlfriend multiple times then killed himself (I bet he had tons of tattoos all over his body too). But let’s face it, intelligent people don’t deface their bodies with tattoos. President Obama doesn’t have any. Susan Rice doesn’t have any. Maya Angelou doesn’t have any. There are plenty of intelligent Black people that don’t wear tattoos. Why aren’t they esteemed as role models? Why do our youth look up to rappers and sports media instead of people like Neil DeGrasse Tyson?

        Being an asshole is not an insult. I don’t understand why people call me an asshole as if its an insult… It’s badge of honor as far as I’m concerned. So, yeah, I’m an Asshole with a capital A and proud of it.

        Furthermore, clothes do make the man. You will not catch me walking around pulling up saggy over-sized pants because I don’t have a belt, or wearing a brightly colored suit. So, regardless of what YOU were told, clothes DO make the man.

Don't Be Shy...Leave A Comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s